Posts

New Guidance on Climate Related Disclosure and Reporting

On December 14th 2016 the Financial Stability Board’s Task Force on Climate Related Disclosure published its long-awaited recommendation report. The report sets out recommendations for helping businesses disclose climate-related financial risks and opportunities.


The report states that the impact that global warming can have on economies is widely recognised.  However, at present, it is difficult for investors to know which companies are vulnerable to climate risks.  It is recognised that without financial disclosure, the financial impacts of climate change may not be effectively priced.  Pricing of risk is an essential function of financial markets.  It it is increasingly important to also understand the governance and risk management context in which financial results are achieved.

[clickToTweet tweet=”At present, it is difficult for investors to know which companies are vulnerable to #climaterisks.” quote=”At present, it is difficult for investors to know which companies are vulnerable to climate risks.”]

The Task Force states that non-financial disclosures should be:

  • Adoptable by all organisations
  • Included in financial filings
  • Designed to solicit decision-useful, forward-looking information on financial impacts
  • Strong focus on risks and opportunities related to transition to lower-carbon economy

The Task Force’s recommendations apply to all financial sector organisations including real estate asset managers and owners. Importantly, it is recognised that large asset owners and asset managers sit at the top of the investment chain and, therefore, have an important role to play in influencing the organisations in which they invest to provide better climate-related financial disclosures.

Recommendations are structured into four categories, as summarised below.

Governance

Organisations should disclose their governance approaches covering climate-related risks and opportunities.

Recommended disclosures:

  • The board’s oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities
  • Management’s role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities

[clickToTweet tweet=”Orgs should disclose their #governance approaches covering #climate related risks and opportunities” quote=”Organisations should disclose their governance approaches covering climate-related risks and opportunities.”]

Strategy

Organisations should disclose actual and potential impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities.

Recommended disclosures:

  • Climate related risks and opportunities the organisation has identified over the short, medium, and long term
  • The impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation’s businesses, strategy, and financial planning
  • The potential impact of different scenarios, including a 2°C scenario, on the organisations businesses, strategy, and financial planning (a clear link to the adoption of science based targets)

[clickToTweet tweet=”Orgs should disclose actual and potential impacts of #climate related #risks and #opportunities” quote=”Organisations should disclose actual and potential impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities.”]

Risk Management

Organisations should disclose how they identify, assesses, and manage climate-related risks.

Recommended disclosures:

  • Processes for identifying and assessing climate-related risks
  • Processes for managing climate-related risks
  • Processes for identifying, assessing, and managing climate- related risks are integrated into the organisation’s overall risk management

[clickToTweet tweet=”Organisations should disclose how they identify, assesses, and manage #climate related risks” quote=”Organisations should disclose how they identify, assesses, and manage climate-related risk.”]

Metrics and Targets

Organisations should disclose how metrics and targets are used to measure and manage risk.

Recommended disclosures:

  • Metrics used to assess climate risk
  • Scope 1, 2 and if appropriate (3) GHG emissions
  • Targets used to manage climate change risks and opportunities

[clickToTweet tweet=”Organisations should disclose how #metrics and targets are used to measure & manage #risks” quote=”Organisations should disclose how metrics and targets are used to measure and manage risk.”]

To underpin these recommendations, the Task Force also sets out seven principles for effective disclosure.

  1. Disclosures should represent relevant information
  2. Disclosures should be specific and complete
  3. Disclosures should be clear, balanced, and understandable
  4. Disclosures should be consistent over time
  5. Disclosures should be comparable among companies within a sector, industry, or portfolio
  6. Disclosures should be reliable, verifiable, and objective
  7. Disclosures should be provided on a timely basis

The Task Force’s recommendations provide a foundation to improve investors’ and others’ ability to appropriately assess and price climate-related risks and opportunities.   They are wide ranging but also practical in the near term allowing the financial industry to develop and grow capability to report within a structured framework.

For information and if you want to get more involved, a public consultation to solicit views on the Task Force’s recommendations is now open until 12 February 2017 and can be accessed here.


EVORA is uniquely positioned to support commercial real estate organisations in the development and reporting of climate risk strategies through to implementation of management plans and collation and analysis of sustainability data using SIERA – our industry leading sustainability management software.

Please do not hesitate to contact us for more information.

[clickToTweet tweet=”EVORA is uniquely positioned to support #CRE firms with dev & reporting of #climate risk strategies” quote=”EVORA is uniquely positioned to support commercial real estate organisations in the development and reporting of climate risk strategies.”]

Season’s Greetings and Tips for the Festive Period

With Christmas less than a week away, 2016 is almost at a close, bringing a year of important and exciting developments in the sustainability sector to an end.

Between the outputs of the COP22 UN Climate Change Conference in Marrakesh and a growing emphasis on the need for greater energy efficiency and the potential improvements in the built environment by the International Energy Agency, 2016 has been a year during which sustainability and energy management concerns remained at the forefront of international attention. The recent interest in science based targets and increased participation in GRESB in turn demonstrate growing awareness of the importance of sustainability in the real estate sector.

The outcome of the EU referendum in the UK, the abolition of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and the election of Donald Trump to the post of president of the United States all, however, continue to raise concerns about the outlook of environmental regulation and the scope for coordinated efforts to combat climate change. The close of 2016 thus leaves us with a range of sustainability commitments, opportunities and challenges to address in the coming year.

On behalf of EVORA we would like to wish you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.

We look forward to helping you to stay informed about important developments and supporting you as you navigate the sustainability challenges and opportunities that 2017 is set to bring.

For those committed to keeping up their energy and resource efficiency efforts over the festive periods, see below for a number of tips for the festive period:

  1. Turning down the thermostat: Reducing the heating temperature by 1°C degree between Christmas and new year could reduce the average office energy usage by up to 8% and save enough energy to roast 108 Christmas turkeys.
  2. Switching off all non-essential appliances such as monitors, chargers and printers in the average office over the festive period could save enough energy to power 137,934 TVs during the Queen’s Christmas speech.
  3. Switching off or turning down non-essential lighting: In the average office, switching off non-essential lighting over the festive period could save enough energy to light up 12,163 LED Christmas trees lights for a day.

Would you like to know more about the sustainability challenges and opportunities that 2017 is set to bring? Please get in touch.


 

CRC Annual Report Publication: Key Results for Phase 2

The CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme Annual Report Publication (ARP) covering the first 2 compliance years of Phase 2 has been published today.

CRC Annual Report: key results

Key results for Phase 2 to the end of the 2015/16 compliance year show:

  • Total revenue through carbon allowance purchases in 2015/16 increased 18.2% to £902,957,350 compared to 2014/15
  • Total energy use reported for 2015/16 was 3.2% lower than 2014/15: equivalent to 3,558,208MWh
  • Total reported emissions for 2015/16 were 9.7% lower than 2014/15: equivalent to 4,415,594tCO2
  • 1,858 participants registered for Phase 2; this is a small reduction in the number of participants when compared with the final year of Phase 1

The key results present some very serious numbers, including a near £1bn revenue stream for the government and some notable improvements in energy usage and carbon impact.

3.2% reduction in annual energy usage

The CRC is due to be scrapped following completion of the 2019 compliance year (in July 2019). The Scheme has been widely criticised by Participants as overly burdensome and costly to administer.  Others will argue that the benefit of identifying and reporting annual emissions has brought attention to energy efficiency improvements, as demonstrated through the 3.2% reduction in reported energy use.

Irrespective of what happens going forwards, monitoring will continue to be essential to ensure understanding of energy performance and to help track energy efficiency. Our proprietary software, SIERA, is a market leading, innovative and easy-to-use environmental management software system. SIERA is already managing billions of pounds worth of real estate, and is being rapidly adopted by large organisations across the globe.


Find out how SIERA can transform your data capture and reporting by calling our experts today.


 

Science-Based Targets: Considerations for the Commercial Real Estate Sector

Interest in Science-Based Targets (SBTs) has grown significantly following last year’s Conference of the Parties (COP21) in Paris (which led to a climate change agreement signed by 195 member states) and more recently at COP22 in Marrakech. For a general overview, take a look at Part 1 for a short introduction to Science-Based Targets.

The importance of greenhouse gas emission reductions is expected to have varying implications across different industries. For the commercial real estate sector, there are several issues to consider.

Science-Based Targets: Categorising Emissions

SBT platforms require the input of emissions data, which is then analysed to generate emission reduction targets over time. Greenhouse gas emissions are caused by multiple organisational activities. One way to describe greenhouse gas emissions is through Scopes 1, 2 and 3 according to the GHG Protocol as shown in Figure 1.

Data on emissions from sources is collected, entered into a model, and then targets for each emission scope are set based on the business’ contribution to the overall 2°C reduction plan (agreed at COP21). This relies on the ability to measure and monitor accurately the different categories of greenhouse gas emissions for an organisation’s activities (Figure 1 – GHG Protocol, 2011). The Better Buildings Partnership (2016) recently made this observation, but specifically mentioned the landlord-tenant split and allocation of emissions as the key challenges. The problem for commercial real estate firms is who is made accountable for the emissions– the landlord, the tenant or both?

[clickToTweet tweet=”The problem for #CRE firms is who is accountable for #emissions – the landlord, the tenant or both?” quote=”The problem for commercial real estate firms is who is made accountable for the emissions– the landlord, the tenant or both?”]

Different Approaches

We have been asked by clients to explain how Science-Based Targets actually work in practice. This is a good question. At present, there are many approaches available. Examples include: the Sectoral Decarbonisation Approach (SDA); The Absolute Emissions Compression; The 3% Solution; Climate Stabilisation Intensity Targets (CSI); Corporate Finance Approach to Climate-Stabilising Targets (C-FACT); GHG Emissions per Value Added (GEVA) and Context-based Carbon Metrics (CSO). All have different approaches.

[clickToTweet tweet=”How do #sciencebasedtargets actually work in practice? This blog explores the answer…” quote=”How do Science-Based Targets actually work in practice?”]

The Sectoral Decarbonisation Approach (SDA) is currently being considered alongside other approaches within commercial real estate. It was originally developed by the Carbon Disclosure Project, World Resources Institute and WWF. Here, we focus on this approach, but in the future, we will consider other methodologies.

How does SDA work?

In short, this method splits up the carbon reduction pathway to different kinds of sectors and activities and is based on the establishment of business-level emission trajectories that support the 2°C global warming threshold, developed by the International Energy Agency, which limits the total remaining cumulative energy-related CO2 emissions between 2015 and 2100 to 1,000 GtCO2 (IEA, 2014).

The step-by-step approach for setting emissions targets

The steps below provide a summary of how SDA targets are set (this is intended to be an overview, please contact us for more information).

  1. Identify emissions by converting energy use into CO2e
  2. Categorize by Activity Type or Scope
  3. Produce a forecast of business-as-usual for each activity type – what will emissions look like if the business continues without intervention?
  4. Produce a forecast for each activity type based on the emission reduction required to align with the global 2°C carbon reduction target. This becomes your SBT
  5. Compare Business-as-Usual vs. Science-Based Target for the different activities
  6. Combine activity-level analysis to identify an overall target
  7. Track progress over time, engage and review

Modelling Methodologies – Some Considerations

Emissions data is not the only input that goes into the model – especially with regard to real estate. There are other things to consider:

  • Scale: What do the emissions cover and what is the timescale – building level or portfolio level?
  • Geography and Location: Where does it apply?
  • Activities: What kinds of activities occur in the building? What activity levels are we expecting to see in the building? What are the occupancy levels like? What does the electricity-use look like?
  • Trends and Changes Over Time: What are the consumption trends and how do we see this changing in the future i.e. rates of change?
  • The Grid and Energy Procurement: Should carbon emissions from the grid be factored into the model? How are regional variations in the make-up of the grid and type of energy procurement taken into account in the emission scenarios?

On the whole, there is the question of what to include or exclude from the model. There is a risk of data over-refinements and normalisation, which could lead to an erroneous not-so-Science-Based result, which could be meaningless as a strategy!

Data Accuracies: Measurement and Monitoring

Target-Setting begins with data. If the data was poor at the outset, it cannot be considered to be a true reflection of what is happening in reality and as a result, any target would be inaccurate. SBTs are only scientific in their alignment to decarbonisation pathways which lead to a limit of 2°C global surface temperature increase, but it is wrong to believe that SBTs can act as the silver-bullet approach to achieve cost-savings and greenhouse gas emission reductions directly.

[clickToTweet tweet=”It is wrong to believe that #sciencebasedtargets can act as a silver-bullet approach…” quote=”It is wrong to believe that SBTs can act as the silver-bullet approach to achieve cost-savings and greenhouse gas emission reductions directly.”]

Another issue is how to set the baseline for SBTs. Of course, the scale and extent of data matters in this case, especially with the issues of measurement, monitoring and completeness of greenhouse gas emissions data at the building and portfolio level.

Concluding Remarks

Setting SBTs has the potential to convey a message and a common goal; but there is a need to link to the bigger picture.

Other factors should be considered alongside SBTs for maximizing the performance of portfolios through achieving energy and cost-saving opportunities. The setting of SBTs as outlined above does not consider opportunity for improvement. SBTs should be used as the initial framework and its design should be informed by data and sustainability management strategies, as well as the climate science. Performance must also be tracked over time to assess alignment to the target.

In the future, SBTs are expected to be a popular area for development, but for now, take-up is still slow in the commercial real estate industry.


What next? It is clear that there is no one-size-fits-all approach, if you identify any issues on sustainability and data management strategies that you would like to talk to us more about, please get in touch.



Further reading:

We’re Hiring! Senior Sustainability Consultant Required to Support Our Growth

Position: Senior Sustainability Consultant
Salary: Up to £37,000 plus benefits and bonus
Location: London or Bolton, Greater Manchester


Overview

EVORA is a successful sustainability consultancy specialising in commercial real estate, which has also developed a market-leading sustainability management software, SIERA. We have an outstanding team of committed professionals and an enviable client base of international blue chip companies, including global property advisors, institutional fund managers and banks.

To support the exciting growth of the business, we are seeking a highly motivated and talented sustainability professional at Senior Consultant level. This position offers a very exciting opportunity to work with high profile blue chip companies delivering a broad spectrum of sustainability services, offering great career potential.

Passion and a determination to deliver excellence are essential qualities, as is a commercially astute and innovative approach to delivering client solutions.


Purpose

  • Delivery of a broad range of sustainability services to commercial real estate sector clients
  • Client management
  • Support in business development

Core Responsibilities

  • EMS development and operation to ISO certification levels
  • CRC management & GHG reporting
  • GRESB completion
  • Manage large environmental data management programmes, coordinating multiple parties across Europe
  • Monitoring and analysis of energy consumption data
  • Client management

Requirements

  • Degree or Masters in related subject & membership of an appropriate and recognised professional body (e.g. IEMA associate/full member)
  • Creative and resourceful with an ability to laterally apply knowledge to deliver value added solutions
  • Detailed understanding of environmental legislation
  • Second European language desirable but not essential
  • Highly articulate and numerate
  • Advanced IT skills

To apply for this position, please send your CV and a covering letter to info@evoraglobal.com with “Senior Sustainability Consultant Application” as the subject of the email.

Science-Based Targets: A Quick Introduction

This is an introductory post. To find out what Science-Based Targets mean for commercial real estate firms, look out for Part 2. You can join our exclusive mailing list here.


What does it all mean?

Interest in Science-Based Targets (SBTs) has grown significantly following last year’s Conference of the Parties (COP21) in Paris (which led to a climate change agreement signed by 195 member states) and more recently at COP22 in Marrakech.

Climate modelling studies point to the influence of human-driven climate change on increasing overall global surface temperatures. SBTs have been established to support achievement of the agreed target which aims to keep global warming below 2°C compared to pre-industrial temperatures (IPCC, 2013). Thus, it is important to situate CO2 emissions within the framework of the past, present and future (IPCC, 2013) and this represents a long-term commitment in tackling climate change.

Science-Based Targets: The Potential?

There is a lot of potential for SBTs, as their use could bolster corporate action on making long-term greenhouse gas emission reductions, as carbon emissions have been proven to enhance the earth’s greenhouse effect, leading to increasing global surface temperatures.

However, SBTs will only be effective because they align to the Paris Agreement’s 2°C target which is a simple, clear goal that not only conveys the urgency of the need for action, but also allows policy-makers to make decisions which have global significance (Rahmstorf, 2014).

How Scientific is a Science-Based Target?

SBTs are scientific in the sense that they align to the 2°C global warming target, but the process that goes into designing a SBT is complex and resource-intensive and may not be transparent to the user. As with climate modelling techniques, tools used to inform SBTs are still undergoing refinements, and to this end, there are still some issues to consider in terms of their practical applications.

To the user, SBTs appear as a ‘black box’ solution. Information on user activities are inputted into the systems and this is used to generate outputs.  However, to the regular user, little known about how the calculations are made. Understanding on how SBTs work will need to develop before we see widespread use.

Even without a SBT, it makes sense to seek energy-saving measures, apply sustainability strategies to prevent loss of financial value and improve organizational reputation. If used correctly, a SBT can support development of improvement goals and plans. However, such targets can vary according to the context of use, importantly, the data used to inform the target-setting process at the outset. Moving forward, it will be important to assess the applicability of each SBT approach and how it works in practice.

Final Thoughts

There are multiple SBT methodologies out there and results will differ dependent on the approach taken. At a user level the analogy of cake baking using different ovens can be used.  All ingredients are prepared in the same way, however, different ovens lead to differing results. One questions whether multiple different approaches will help to achieve the common goal or will the complexity cause confusion and possibly even slow progress.

SBTs are still in their infancy.  Profile is increasing but understanding is still low. The initiative is certainly thought-provoking and something to look out for in the future. At the present time, SBTs do not have the same weight in the commercial real estate sector than it does in other sectors and take-up has been slow.


Look out for Part 2 in this series: Science-Based Targets: Discussions for Commercial Real Estate


To talk to us about Science-Based Targets and what they mean for your organisation, please get in touch.


Interesting Links:

Science-Based Targets Initiative

COP22 Marrakech

IPCC: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis

How Can GRESB Help to Deliver Fund Performance? Key Highlights from Our Exclusive Event

Read this post for some exclusive updates from GRESB that were announced during the event, and to find out how you can make sure you don’t miss out on attending our future events.


Background

On Tuesday 15th November 2016, EVORA ran an important industry event considering the impact GRESB (the Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark) is having on the real estate industry. Over 60 attendees from more than 50 commercial real estate firms attended.

As a business that works solely with the real estate sector in providing practical sustainability solutions, EVORA has seen the meteoric rise of GRESB since its initiation six years ago. In fact, we have been working with GRESB and supporting our clients in the completion of the survey since 2011 – we are also a GRESB Premier Partner – and this year we were involved in the completion of 41 submissions. So it’s fair to say that GRESB is a subject that’s close to our hearts!

There is no doubt that GRESB has had a major impact in mobilizing the real estate industry to embrace the issues of sustainability. From its humble beginnings in 2010, 2016 saw 759 participants complete the survey representing US$2.8 trillion of asset value. However, the benchmark survey is complex and challenging to complete and GRESB pretty much has a monopoly in this area of benchmarking the sustainability performance of real estate portfolios.

[clickToTweet tweet=”There’s no doubt @GRESB has mobilized the CRE sector to embrace the issues of sustainability.” quote=”There is no doubt that GRESB has had a major impact in mobilizing the real estate industry to embrace the issues of sustainability.”]

And it was with this in mind, that we decided to run this exclusive invitation-only event, kindly hosted by TH Real Estate and chaired by Sarah Ratcliffe, Programme Director at the BBP, which considered ‘How Can GRESB Help to Deliver Fund Performance?’.

Great representation from industry leaders

We had five outstanding speakers from the industry, each with their own experiences and opinions of GRESB: Abigail Dean, Head of Sustainability at TH Real Estate; Dan Grandage, Head of Sustainability at Aberdeen Asset Management; Mathieu Elshout, Investment Director at PGGM; Erik Ruane, formerly Head of Development and Head of Sustainability at a leading pan-European, real estate fund management group; and last but by no means least, our own Paul Sutcliffe, co-Founder and Director at EVORA.

The results of our pre-event survey

Paul presented the results from our pre-event survey completed by the participants, which provided some interesting findings.

Firstly, the majority agreed that GRESB is both investor-driven and important to investors, which should be no surprise, since this was the original intention of GRESB.

Of greater note, was the far smaller proportion who thought their GRESB rating fairly reflected their sustainability performance and accurately reflected the key issues, highlighting that many respondents feel that greater alignment is required.

[clickToTweet tweet=”Does your @GRESB rating fairly reflect your overall #sustainability performance?” quote=”Do you think your GRESB rating fairly reflects your overall sustainability performance?”]

Opinions of the Speakers

1. The Benefits

Paul kicked off by re-enforcing that GRESB is a force for good, driving change and focusing on participation. He also highlighted the alignment of the survey to a best practice management system approach (Plan/Do/Check/Act), which from our own experiences, support in driving performance – see our well-received thought leadership piece by Ed Gabbitas on this:

Environmental Management Systems: Plan-Do-Check-Act…Deliver?

Abigail highlighted that GRESB had pushed the industry to improve, whilst enhancing investor insight. Dan and Mathieu also said it supported fund strategy and post-performance evaluation, helping in year-on-year objective and target setting for the funds. Importantly, Erik highlighted that at a more practical level, GRESB had promoted wider utility data collection enabling the funds to better understand performance both at portfolio and asset level.

[clickToTweet tweet=”@GRESB has promoted wider utility #data collection enabling funds to better understand performance.” quote=”GRESB has promoted wider utility data collection enabling funds to better understand performance both at portfolio and asset level.”]

2. The Challenges

What did the speakers see as the challenges? Paul and Abigail highlighted that scoring rewards the wrong behaviour by being more about coverage of data than efficient buildings, and year-on-year improvements rather than absolute performance. Another key issue was the risk of chasing GRESB points, which may not add value to the fund.

A consistent theme from all the presenters was that one size did not fit all, with specific reference to opportunistic and value add funds that can struggle to perform well in the survey, a key area Sander Paul of GRESB picked up on in the Q&A – keep reading!

A Lively Q&A Session

Presentations were followed by a lively Q&A discussion with a panel that included Sander Paul van Tongeren, Head of EMEA and co-founder of GRESB, and Olivia Muir, European Analyst at UBS. Olivia, highlighted from an investor perspective the importance of GRESB to provide a due diligence tool for the capital markets, but accepted that the GRESB performance data had to be re-worked to provide appropriate outputs.

Our attendees heard it first! Exciting updates for 2018, direct from GRESB

Sander Paul agreed that one size fits all is not ideal. He advised 2017 would be a period of stability for the GRESB Real Estate Assessment with minor updates, but that there would be changes going forward. GRESB is exploring property type supplements, where ESG-performance would be aligned to the specific nuances of different property types, and potentially regional supplements as well.

New industry working groups will be set up in early 2017 to support in the development of the 2018 GRESB Real Estate Assessment.

However, he did highlight that GRESB also offers a Developer Assessment, which might be applicable to some of the opportunistic and value add funds that consider development activities to be their core business. It is a stand-alone assessment that contains a selection of questions from the Real Estate Assessment.

Sander Paul also spoke of the importance of optimising property portfolios to reduce their environmental impacts to counter the significant risks of climate change. He expressed the need for disruptive technologies to help achieve this, including innovative software solutions, an area we have majored on with the development of our unique real estate focused sustainability management software, SIERA.

Comments were also made that the GRESB scoring had been opaque. Sander Paul advised that the GRESB validation process and scoring model is now available here, and also on their website.

[clickToTweet tweet=”The @GRESB validation process and scoring model is now available on their website.” quote=”The GRESB validation process and scoring model is now available on their website.”]

A great wrap-up by Sarah Ratcliffe

In summing up, Sarah Ratcliffe provided a fantastic analogy of the evolution of GRESB, comparing it to a child growing up and currently being a teenager; slightly spotty, with a number of imperfections and a bit awkward, but with lots of potential!

I’d agree with this and I certainly do believe in GRESB’s potential. However, as an industry, the onus is upon us to ensure that GRESB not only transforms through mobilising the real estate sector, but also that the content – and hence the scoring – is absolutely aligned to material sustainability issues that can impact on fund performance both now and in the future.


This was an invitation-only event to those on our mailing list.

If you did not receive an invitation but would have liked to attend, please click here to join our mailing list now.


To talk to us about GRESB support in 2017, implementing an EMS, or to request a demo of SIERA, please get in touch.


Further reading:


GRESB also offers an ESG Masterclass which focuses on interpretation of the annual GRESB Real Estate Assessment results and the various reporting and benchmarking tools available to real estate investors, companies and fund managers. The program addresses all material aspects of ESG in real estate investment portfolios as covered by the GRESB Real Estate Assessment.

The Future of Sustainability In The Commercial Real Estate Sector

The Future of Sustainability In The Commercial Real Estate Sector: A Summary of the 7th Annual 40 Percent Symposium


Read this post if:

  • you had wanted to attend the Symposium but were not able to make it
  • you’d like a quick overview of the key points of discussion throughout the day
  • you heard something about the link between frothy beer and the value of data (?!)
  • you’re interested in the feedback of this year’s attendees
  • you’d like to express your interest in attending the next Symposium in April 2018

Introduction

On Thursday 3rd November, approximately 60 senior commercial real estate and sustainability professionals gathered at the Regent Hotel in Berlin for the 7th Annual 40 Percent Symposium.

Founded in 2011 by John Pike, the aim of the Symposium is to create a one-day, high-quality conference which gives delegates a complete overview of current sustainability issues as they affect commercial property both from an investor’s and occupier’s perspective.

“To attend a 40 Percent Symposium is to join a committed and thoughtful audience of like-minded property and investment professionals who understand the need to deliver a sustainable future in property. The 2016 Symposium was our most successful event yet.”

John Pike, Founder and Managing Director, The 40 Percent Symposium

After having been held in London in 2015, this year saw the Symposium make a welcome return to Germany, where the event has always been held in high esteem, not least for the fact that it manages to attract attendees from a broader spread of countries.

This year, we were delighted to welcome attendees from more than 7 countries including the UK, Germany, Sweden, Finland, Portugal, The Netherlands and the USA, all eager to network with their peers and share best practices.


Keynote Address

“Let’s pay more attention to the optimisation of existing buildings’ energy performance…”

The day was kicked off by Martin Brühl, Managing Director of Union Investment and RICS Past President 2015/2016. Mr Brühl delivered a catchy keynote address in which he stressed the importance of optimising the energy performance of existing buildings in addition to the weight that is often placed on the credentials of new builds.

“Today’s 40 Percent Symposium will mark one essential step towards making sustainability our business as usual… Each of us can contribute to that today, embed what we learn from others in our business routine and tell our clients about it. So our work is cut out and we must succeed. This should be an exciting day.”

Martin Brühl, Managing Director, Union Investment


The Outlook for Political Change in the CRE Sector

The first session of the day saw four experts exploring the following topics:

  • European Union carbon dioxide targets and an outlook on the corresponding regulation changes in Europe and Germany.
  • Thoughts on opportunities and challenges of green policy in the commercial real estate sector.
  • Market perspectives on landlord and tenant relationships and legal implications. Examples beyond pure regulation.
  • How to get tenants on board. Launch of a new sustainability survey to get feedback from real estate users.

The audience showed their engagement early on, with several questions to the panel on the social side of sustainability, including the UK’s Modern Slavery Act, on which one of our sustainability consultants, Louise Russell, has written this informative and well-received blog.

Attendees were also particularly keen to hear more about the work that ECE has done across its shopping centres, which includes collaborating with Philips to develop a new lightbulb.


Economics, Opportunities and Risks, from an Investor Perspective

Next up, these four experts delivered engaging presentations on the following topics:

  • The investors’ long-term risk: without green investment, performance improvement is not possible.
  • How does the enhancement of health and wellbeing in the built environment affect value in real estate?
  • How can the GRESB Assessment support the industry to optimise risk/return profiles of real asset investments?
  • Update on market value of green building certified assets in Europe.

The audience was particularly eager to ask as many questions as possible to Dr. Whitney Austin Gray, Executive Director of Research and Innovation at Delos, following her presentation on health and wellbeing. Health and wellbeing is a topic that is gaining ever more interest each week; is it ‘the next sustainability’?

GRESB was also discussed at length during the panel session and the networking breaks, with many attendees asking us about the support we have provided on multiple GRESB submissions through the combination of our consultancy expertise and our sustainability management software, SIERA.

“I thoroughly enjoyed the 40 Percent Symposium, especially the well-balanced mix of investors, developers and other organizations.”

Kay Killman, President, German Green Building Association


Best Practice From Across Europe, Focusing on Innovation

The final session of the day, split into two parts, saw these seven speakers present on the following subject matter:

  • 2050 climate goals for apartment buildings built and realised in 2014.
  • Spondability: Sponda’s signature of responsibility, which takes economic, social and environmental aspects into consideration.
  • Creating green value.
  • How data delivers sustainable value.
  • Turning global challenges into business opportunities.
  • The underestimated energy saving potential: premature pump replacement in existing buildings.
  • Harnessing consumer power.

In many ways, this session is what the 40 Symposium is all about – attendees learning about best practices from their peers.

The audience remained highly engaged right up until the close of the final presentation, keen to learn more about everything from water pump replacements to how seriously Sponda, the Finnish real estate investment company, takes CSR measures.

It was also our chance to shine, with our Managing Director, Chris Bennett, delivering a highly entertaining presentation on the value of data to commercial real estate firms. If you’d like to learn more about the relationship between frothy beer and well-managed sustainability data, you’ll have to get in touch! To whet your appetite, you can watch a short clip of Chris’ presentation in the embedded Tweet below.

“For my colleagues and I, this was a fantastic event; well organised and with top content. We had many interesting discussions!”

Frank Räder, Head of Customer Training, Grundfos


The 40 Percent Symposium Will Return in April 2018!

We’re delighted with how well this year’s Symposium was received by all attendees. So much so, in fact, that a placeholder date has already been set for the next one in April 2018!

Based on the excellent feedback of attendees saying that they valued being able to get to Berlin very easily and the opportunity to meet colleagues from all over Europe and beyond, the Symposium will once again be held in Berlin.

Here’s what our partner, Dr. Birgit Memminger-Rieve has to say:

To host the 40 Percent Symposium and bring it back to Germany as an international sustainability conference has been a great experience. Very many thanks to John Pike, who moderated the conference with ease and charm and to the EMA Events team that made sure that our schedule was followed with no delays. I’ve talked to a lot of attendees to get their feedback, which I’d like to summarize here.

The Regent Hotel was a great venue and everyone felt at ease during the day, enjoying and discussing versatile and interesting topics with great speakers from various countries. They say they appreciated having this international symposium in Berlin, giving them insight to the actual political framework, current sustainability studies, and best practice experiences. More practical examples would be good to learn about next time. They also emphasized the excellent networking opportunity during the breaks and at the drinks reception in the evening.

All in all, we’re looking forward to the next Symposium in April 2018.”

Dr. Birgit Memminger-Rieve, Managing Partner, ES EnviroSustain – German consultancy partner to EVORA


To register your interest in attending the next 40 Percent Symposium in Berlin in April 2018, click here now.


Follow us on LinkedIn:


Connect With The Speakers, Sponsors and Organisers of the 7th Annual 40 Percent Symposium

Using Listly, we have created the following list of all the Organisers, Speakers, Sponsors and Partners of the 7th Annual 40 Percent Symposium to connect with, which took place on 3rd November 2016 at the Regent Hotel in Berlin.

This allows you to follow and/or connect with those involved with this year’s Symposium. For example, you can follow some of the speakers on Twitter or, where social media profiles didn’t exist, learn more about the company by visiting its website.

Stay tuned for our full post-event write-ups.


Legal Update: Heat Network Regulations

The Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS) has confirmed that no regulatory action will be taken for non-compliance with key requirements set out in the Heat Network (Metering and Billing) Regulations 2014; namely, in relation to ‘heat suppliers’ testing whether it is cost-effective to fit heat meters in multi-occupancy buildings, and where appropriate, fitting them by 31 December 2016.  However, it must also be noted that the remaining requirements in the regulations are unaffected (for example in relation to installation of heat meters at newly constructed buildings).

BEIS does, however, intend to launch a public consultation on a new cost effectiveness tool and accompanying regulatory amendments in early 2017.

About the Heat Network Regulations

A heat supplier obligated under the regulations is defined as a person (or organisation) who supplies and charges for the supply of heating, cooling or hot water to a final customer, through either communal heating or a district heating network.

Whoever is supplying the end user with heat is classed as a heat supplier. This includes the supply of heat as part of a package – i.e. through a service contract. The contract does not need to explicitly mention the supply of heat. Shared / multi-let offices and shopping centres where heating and/or chilled water is provided to more than one tenant in a building are identified as obligated examples within the guidance document.

Requirements

Heat suppliers were required to notify the National Measurement Office of the existence of heat networks by 31st December 2015.

In addition to notification, heat suppliers were required to test whether it is cost-effective to fit heat meters in multi-occupancy buildings, and where appropriate, fit them by 31 December 2016.

Regulatory Update

The cost effectiveness tool is currently being revised by the department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS). Therefore, pending the revision of the tool it is advised that no further assessments should be undertaken.

“The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has confirmed that it would not be appropriate for them (the FCA) to impose fines or other disciplinary measures in respect of a breach of the requirement within the heat network (metering and billing) regulations 2014 (as amended), that certain heat suppliers must test whether it is cost-effective to fit heat meters in multi-occupancy buildings, and where appropriate, fit them by 31 December 2016.”

“Furthermore, it is unlikely that the FCA would take other regulatory action (where a heat supplier was separately regulated by the FCA) if the only non-compliance was in relation to the requirement to test for and fit meters where cost effective. As such, it is not considered necessary for a heat supplier to inform the FCA if it has been unable to meet this requirement.”

What next?

Following a planned public consultation, BEIS intend to launch the new cost effectiveness tool and accompanying regulatory amendments later in 2017.

EVORA will be watching updates on regulatory amendments in 2017 and can assist you in maintaining your compliance.

[clickToTweet tweet=”Discover how EVORA can support you with the Heat Network Regulations.” quote=”Discover how EVORA can support you with the Heat Network Regulations.”]

Questions? Please don’t hesitate to get in touch.


Follow us on LinkedIn: